Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon after 2004, animated!

I found an easy reproducible code example to make animated GIFs in R which allowed me to produce these plots very quickly. They show how clear-cut deforestation developed developed over time since the all time high in 2004.

Overall Brazilians successfully reduced deforestation until 2012. Since 2012 the rates increased slightly. We can observe in this animated GIFs how the share in overall deforestation of different Amazon states changed.


States with traditionally high deforestation shares are Rondônia, Mato Grosso and Pará. They account  for the very large part of the total deforestation. Pará inherited the fist place from Mato Grosso with almost 60% share of total deforstation in 2009. However since 2010 also Mato Grossos share increased again. The state of Amazonas is a new emergent player where forest fall especially in the southern part (Boca do Acre). Amazonas state almost levels the share of Rondônia which was was in the 80s and 90s the state where large part of the deforestation took place. The five other states have overall low shares:


However if we compare how the states performed to reduce deforestation by their own standards the picture changes. In the following plot we compare the deforestation rates relative to the base year 2004 which had the highest rates of all times. We see that Pará, Rondônia and especially Mato Grosso where able to reduce overall deforestation even with the slight increase since 2012. The Amazonas state however is almost back to its level of 2004. This could indicate that the Amazonas state is a region to look out when it comes to future deforestation trends in the next couple of years.


The other five states also reduced deforestation to different degrees however we observe that Roraima, Maranhão and Amapá had even higher levels for some years after 2004 compared to their baseline. Acre and Tocantins reduced deforestation quickly but had sharp increases in 2016. These regional shifts show how diverse the region reacted to the environmental policies that where introduced in the last two decades two foster deforestation control.


Radio interview on recent deforestation increase in the Brazilian Amazon

Latest deforestation data from PRODES suggest that there was an increase in clear cut deforestation of 29% in 2016. An area of almost 8.000 square-kilometers, equivalent to 1.6 Mio. football fields was deforested in 2016 with sharp increases along the agricultural frontier. Is this a sign that the trend for reducing deforestation in Brazil is going to revert again?

In the In this short radio-interview with Christoph König from SWR2 Impuls I discuss some of the eventual drivers of this recent change and possible solutions  to address this problem in the future. You can download the german podcast here.


Annual relative variation of clear cut deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Source: PRODES


Brazilian municipality evolution and time-series analysis

Sumário em português:

Analisando dados estatísticos do Brasil em escala municipal encontramos o problema da divisão de municípios ao longo dos anos. A evolução da malha municipal dificulta a análise de dados em series temporais por que os novos municípios não tem dados para os anos prévios a sua criação,- Além disso os velhos municípios que foram divididos não podem ser comparados antes e depois da sua divisão por que perderam território e gente. No seguinte texto apresento uma metodologia (em inglês) para lidar com este problema agregando os municípios em grupos baseados na evolução da malha municipal ao longo dos anos. Os grupos baseados nessa agregação podem ser baixados para os anos 1980, 1991 e 2000 referente à malha municipal de 2010. As agregações permitem analisar todo tipo de dado socioeconómico e demográfico do Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE e de outras instituições académicas e estaduais.

Long version

In statistical analysis we may encounter the problem that our units of observation change over time. This is true for the case of Brazilian municipality data where the units of observation change due to the fact that a lot of new municipalities were created during the last decades. In 2010 Brazil possessed 5567 municipalities of which 3991 where created between 1940 and 2010. Those new municipalities lack data for the previous years to their existence. If a municipality was e.g. created in 1994, there is no demographic data previous to 1994. Furthermore, since municipalities are not created out of nothing, one or multiple other municipalities might suddenly experience a decrease in population in the subsequent year (here 1995) because their areas and populations were divided. This is also true for a large set of other socio-economic variables that are produced in the studies of the Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics (IBGE) and others. If we analyze the development of municipalities over time we have to account for this problem in order to avoid artificial increases or decreases in our variables, that might be largely a legacy of administrative change.

In Brazil, municipality creation spurred especially in the 1980s in course of the decentralization policies and ongoing population increase in the rural and urban areas. Although IBGE provides information on the evolution of the so called “Malha Municipal“ I was not able to identify a method or data-set that specifically solved that problem.

Therefore, I developed a set of algorithms in R that help to group municipalities on a base year e.g. 1991 in order to create an aggregation level that is neutral to municipality change. I applied these algorithms for the years 1980,1991 and 2000, which are the years of the population censuses prior to 2010. Furthermore, I limited the analysis to the states of the Brazilian Amazon, since some manual edits have to be made to the raw data, if municipalities where e.g. misspelled by the staff that created the documentation on the evolution of the „Malha Municipal“. Doing it for the whole country with the R script should be still feasible with a few hours of extra work. If you are interested, I can provide you the script and some explanations on how to use it.

For the theoretical part I have two images that show how the aggregation is done. The fist image shows a typical situation on how municipalities might split up over the years. In this example between 1991 and 2000 the municipality “d“ developed out of „a“ alone. Between 2000 and 2010 “b“ developed out of „a“ and „c“.


Here we already get a notion of the complexity of the task since a new municipality often develops out of multiple others and group affiliation changes over  time. If we group these municipalities together we create aggregates from municipalities, that did not form an administrative unit in the past. This is a little drawback but there is no other way around it since “b“ might contain both, population data from „a“ and „c“.

Image 2 shows how the algorithm for creating the groups actually works.


For my analysis I used this Excel sheet from IBGE that contains information on how municipalities developed over time. IBGE also provides detailed, yearly information on the development of the “Malha municipal” in each state. With this raw-material it is theoretically possible to go back to any year of interest to get the minimum amount of aggregation necessary for your analysis. However, it takes some time to download and prepare the data in order to be comparable to the table linked above.

The results of my aggregation are shown below. You can download the Shapefile that contains the groups based on the year 1980,1991 and 2000. The data is based on the Malha Municipal from 2010 with three columns called “m_1980″,”m_1990” and “m_2000”. Those columns contain either the group affiliation or the geocode of the municipality if it was not affiliated to any group.

  • “m_1980” contains muncipalities that where part of a group in 1970 and where splitted during 1970 and 1980. Altogether 139 municipalities where created and 221 municipalities where part of the splitting process, hence they have a group affiliation.
  • “m_1991” contains muncipalities that where part of a group in 1980 and where splitted during 1980 and 1991. Altogether 263 municipalities where created and 497 municipalities where part of the splitting process, hence they have a group affiliation.
  • “m_2000” contains muncipalities that where part of a group in 1991 and where splitted during 1991 and 2000. Altogether 15 municipalities where created and 32 municipalities where part of the splitting process, hence they have a group affiliation.

Furthermore, you can find seven columns with the geocodes of those municipalities that gave origin to another municipality in each respective year.My proposed methodology gives the minimum amount of aggregation necessary.

In the data-set I utilized there were no new municipalities created between 2000 and 2010. I cannot tell for sure however, if this is due to a lack of actual creation of municipalities in the region or if the dataset from IBGE is outdated. Other sources point to the fact that at least between 2000 and 2010 the number of municipalities increased from 5507 to 5565. It is unclear however how many municipalities where created in the Amazon States. Checking with official shapefiles on the “malha municipal from IBGE” we observe that

  • in 2000: only 792 municipalities existed in the nine Amazon states
  • in 2007: 807  and
  • in 2015: 808

It is most probable therefore, that the data-set is somehow incomplete.

Last but not least let me point you to the fact, that besides the separation of municipalities also municipality boundaries and hence their areas changed during the years, which is not documented in a comprehensive way and might pose a problem depending on your type of analysis. You see a comparison in in the last image of the Acrean municipalities in 1991 (purple with black boundaries) and 2010 (gray with red boundaries).


One might assume that aggregation based on intersects might be also an adequate tool for this problem, however if combining intersections and the grouping based on the evolution of the “Malha Municipal”, the groups might get too many members to be useful in your analysis.

Field trip to the Brazilian Amazon

These photos will show some impressions from my field trip to the Brazilian Amazon region in 2015. All in all I stayed about three month in the region to make interviews with local farmers about their production systems and their attitudes towards protection of the natural rain forest. My interviews covered a large area of the Amazon in the states of Acre and Mato Grosso.

1-mapThe state of Mato Grosso and Acre in red

My studies are part of a research-project at the Centre for Development Research in Bonn that is funded by the Robert-Bosch-Fundation.  The project seeks to understand how environmental policies can contribute to lower deforestation and foster sustainable land-use in tropical rain-forest regions.

During the field research I interviewed persons about their land-use choices including the use of new technologies to increase productivity and the role of deforestation in current land-use practices. I hope to understand how social and economic forces drive these phenomena and how the effectiveness of current policy approaches is influenced by those circumstances.

All in all we were performing more than 100 interviews with farmers in different socio-economic settings. We spoke to very poor producers who rely on a relatively small piece of land as their sole income source and very rich producers who possess thousands of hectares of agricultural land and have very diversified income portfolios the span into other sectors of the economy as well.Interview participantsTraditionally cattle ranching is one of the most important drivers of  deforestation in the Amazon region. In Brazil cattle ranching was the preferred development model to open up and occupy vast areas of pristine rain forest along the main infrastructure projects in the North. Throughout decades large amounts of public money were spent to incentivize and subsidize the expansion of cattle-ranching in the region. 


Growth of export value of Brazilian Cattle. Source: Mongabay

Up to date, a huge part of the cattle production-systems in the Amazon are characterized by very low technological production-levels. Farmers miss important inputs such as fertilizers or herbicides to maintain the productivity of pastures. Also there is also a lack of additional fodder in the dry season and adequate veterinary assistance to increase nutrition levels and productivity of the animals.

4-cowAnimals might get very skinny in the dry season if not fed with additional fodder.

With few inputs, productivity declines rapidly in the pasture and producers rely on deforestation to gather new land suitable for production. Since the environmental impacts of deforestation where not a political concern for many decades and land was relatively abundant, the cheapest form to maintain or increase production was to open up new areas for pasture creation.

5 def 4Freshly  deforested area in Northern Mato Grosso.

Like this more forest areas got burned to the ground. Up to date around 20% of the Amazon rain-forest have been cleared in Brazil and an equal amount of area is thought to be selectively logged. Since the early 1990s Brazilian Government tried to increase the control of deforestation by implementing new environmental regulations and  building up governmental entities to control land-take and usage.

6 ibama police

Heavily armed military forces  have to back up field  enforcement actions of  environmental  agencies like IBAMA.

New policies where successful to reduce deforestation in the last ten years by increasing law enforcement and putting more pressure on the local governments to address the problem. Still it is questionable to which degree those approaches will be able to maintain or further lower deforestation rates in the future as more recent data suggests.

7 prodes

Clear cut deforested areas in square kilometres as observed by the Brazilian Forest Monitoring Program PRODES from 1988 to 2015. Source: INPE.

Inside the agricultural sector, environmental policies have created huge tensions because they are associated with negative impacts on production levels and the income of farmers. A lot of producers criticize environmental policies  for being incongruent with what was supported or even demanded by policies in the past.

One main challenge to reduce the pressure on the forest is therefore to overcome the old production paradigm and develop land-use options that demand less areas be it either by increasing productivity inside cattle-systems or diversifying the production of cattle ranchers as such. By this environmental and socio-economical goals could be achieved in line.

8 sustainable 1

Animal confinement is a form of  intensive cattle-ranching that is able to reduce the amount of necessary land considerably.

8 sustainable 2A farmer showing palm- fruits from his palm-trees that are part of a combined silvo-pastoral land-use system that is able to increase income and carbon storage on existing pasture areas.

One big challenge to change the current production systems is the lack of adequate infrastructure. Even though there is evidence, that expanding infrastructure is a precondition for opening up new areas, this does not automatically mean that the worse the infrastructure the better off the environment.

We continuously observed that bad infrastructure might be worse for the environment than good infrastructure. With less access to reliable infrastructure, farmers prefer to have a product that can be commercialized throughout the whole year (cattle) instead of a crop that is normally commercialized after harvest where the farm might not be accessible due to rains. This is especially true for regions with few storage capacities (e.g. grain silos).

9 infra 4Bad infrastructure reduces accessibility through the rainy season…

9 infra 5…and puts  burdens to daily live e.g. through the  inability to travel. On our journey from Mato Grosso to Acre we got surprised by a sudden rain that took us of the road for several hours.

Furthermore high transportation costs from bad infrastructure might also increase significantly the costs for production inputs thereby increasing the attractiveness of deforestation over land reform (e.g. more expensive fertilizers or agricultural lime for reducing soil acidity).

9 infra 7Bad access to farms might eliminate the chance for more intensive land-use. Animals however can walk over broken bridges and wade through riverbeds themselves. Some farmers make their cattle walk over 200 km to take them to the next market.

Being a more viable option under poor infrastructural conditions cattle ranching is also favourable under difficult biophysical conditions such as steep slopes where mechanized agriculture is not viable. During our field-trip, regions with a very undulated topography where often partially characterized by cattle ranching.

10 hillyA pasture of a relatively small farm in Northern Acre

Besides economic reasons, cattle ranching also brings a lot of other benefits to farmers that are commonly less addressed in the literature. Cattle creation is for example significantly less labour demanding and often easier to apply and manage than agriculture. Even though farmers could significantly increase their income changing production e.g. to coffee plantations, they prefer cattle over crops for the relative easiness in  implementation.

Another benefit is the herd itself functioning like a rural bank account. A growing herd is like a  growing capital stock  that is easy exchangeable for cash throughout the whole year. Cattle can therefore serve as a form of social security since it provides money for emergency spendings or investments, particularly in regions, where financial services are sparse. As long as the herd is visibly growing the farmer feels to be on the safe side.

Cattle also brings financial stability to producers since it is less vulnerable to inflation and other economic shocks than other investment forms. By that it is a very attractive investment for either retirement or additional income of people that do not engage traditionally  in agriculture. To our surprise a lot of elder people like retired school teachers or state workers engage in cattle ranching to invest and increase their pensions.

Our upcoming publications will address those issues since they are key to understand the logic of cattle production, its attractiveness and strong persistence in the region as well as its implications for promoting sustainable land-use options in the future. Below you can find some more photos from the trip.

5 def 3A huge fire from deforestations close to the city of Colniza in Northern Mato Grosso. Heavy smoke during the dry season often covers huge areas and affects people living in cities nearby.

9 infra 10Infrastructure development everywhere. Besides huge construction sites it is difficult to maintain the existing road network that is often poorly paved and utilized by very heavy trucks…

IMG_20151209_145425…carrying for example trunks from legal and illegal wood extraction.

IMG_20151209_132546Machines to mix animal fodder for intensive cattle ranching are gaining momentum in central Mato Grosso …

IMG_20151209_132947As well as the expansion of industrialized grain production that often leads to the displacement of cattle ranching to more remote areas.

IMG_20151209_150349Besides being one of the most important rural economic activities, cattle ranching is also a social phenomena with the cowboy culture rising (very nicely documented by Jeffrey Hoelle). This photo shows a gathering of the local cattle elite at an auction of breeding animals at the agricultural fair ExpoAcre .

Germany to invest 550 million € in rainforest protection and renewable energies in Brazil in the upcoming two years

The German government has been supporting Brazilian efforts to control deforestation in the Amazon for several decades within the so called PPG7 program. Currently German Federal Development Cooperation cooperates with Brazil in financial and technical areas to foster rainforest protection. German chancellor Angela Merkel, who is currently visiting Brazil, complimented Brazilian Policy Makers for their efforts during the last years and their ambitious goal to stop deforestation until 2020 . At the same time she committed around 550 million € for investment in rainforest protection and renewable energies in the upcoming two years as German newspaper “Die Zeit” reports on their website.

Deforestation and environmental governance in Paraguay

Paraguay is one of the countries with the most accelerated deforestation rates worldwide. Especially in the dry northern part called Chaco vast amounts of areas where cleared in recent years. The impressive deforestation patterns as observed by satellite imagery show that probably large agribusiness engages in a planned clearance of the Chaco. You can have a look at these patterns in the Hansen data-set here:

Screenshot from 2015-04-29 21:43:46

With weak institutions and most of the land hold in private hands, it is doubtful that Paraguay will be able to curb this development in the near future. Furthermore corruption puts a burden on preserving natural vegetation even inside indigenous reserves. This recent article in Spanish informs about the arrest of Ruben Quesnel former employee at the Paraguayan institute of indigenous people – Instituto Paraguayo del Indígena (INDI). Quesnel is responsible for the sellout of 25.000 hectares of indigenous land and was sentenced to six years in prison:

As environmental governance improves in Brazil, there are rumours that large actors from Brazilian Agribusiness change their strategy to occupy land in Paraguay that is cheaper and less controlled by environmental agencies. Market integration within the Mercosur furthermore facilitates foreign investment. The expansion of soy-bean production in Paraguay contributed to the increase in economic growth within recent years.

The spatial reorganization of land-clearance is also discussed under the terminology of leakage effect and is a very important topic when discussing land-use change on a global scale. Future research on this topic is required to make more reliable statements about inter-regional and cross-border effects of environmental policies to control deforestation.

Import multiple files to R

I have been recently asked a few times how you can import a bunch of data (let’s say for example .csv files) to your R-Environment without copying and pasting a lot of code. I’m not aware of a built-in-package in R that does that for you (although I can imagine that somewhere there might be one) but I will show a little example on how you can do this manually. The advantage is that you can easily modify the code to import other file-types and if you are a beginner with R you might get some feeling for automating, loops and lists in R.

The main idea behind the following code is, that you put all your files into one directory and read them into R with a loop. Therefore you will have to work with lists which serve as a “container” to receive the incoming data. Note that your .csv files need to have the same characteristics in order to automate the process. If you have for example  csv. files with different separators (one with commas and another with semicolons) the import will not work as expected. If you have never imported data into R before, try the read functions on single files before you go to automating.

The code is quite self-explanatory:

## import_multiple_csv_files_to_R
# Purpose: Import multiple csv files to the Global Environment in R

# set working directory

# list all csv files from the current directory
list.files(pattern=".csv$") # use the pattern argument to define a common pattern  for import files with regex. Here: .csv

# create a list from these files

# create an empty list that will serve as a container to receive the incoming files<-list()

# create a loop to read in your data
for (i in 1:length(list.filenames))

# add the names of your data to the list

# now you can index one of your tables like this$deforestation2010.csv

# or this[1]

# you can make a function out of this
tmp.list.1<-list.files(mypath, pattern=mypattern)
for (i in 1:length(tmp.list.1)){tmp.list.2[[i]]<-read.csv(tmp.list.1[i],...)}

# use it like this
# note: with ... we enable the function to refine the import with parameters from read.csv.
# here we define the separator of entries in the csv files to be comma.

# save it to the folder with your custom functions

# load it like this whenever you need it in another script with

# end

Vídeo sobre áreas protegidas

Prezado Leitor,

Estamos contentes em iniciar nosso novo Blog sobre políticas ambientais nos trópicos com um interessante vídeo mostrando a evolução espacial das áreas protegidas no Brasil de 1920 a 2012. Nós criamos esse vídeo para visualizar os esforços realizados pelo governo brasileiro, ONGs e institutos de pesquisa de todo o mundo para reduzir o desmatamento em um a das fronteiras agrícolas mais dinâmicas do mundo. Estudos mostram que o estabelecimento de áreas protegidas foi chave para controlar o desmatamento na Amazônia brasileira, onde as taxas anuais de corte raso caíram desde 2005. Além disso, a demarcação de terras indígenas ajudou a preservar o habitat de comunidades tradicionais e evitar conflitos sobre o uso da terra.

Apesar de este vídeo mostrar avanços impressionantes com relação ao tamanho total das áreas protegidas, grandes desafios ainda existem, para que se atinja a sustentabilidade de longo prazo dos esforços realizados. Estes desafios incluem a gestão das áreas estabelecidas e a recuperação de áreas degradadas, além da promoção de alternativas sustentáveis de geração de renda que equilibrem necessidades ecológicas e o desenvolvimento socioeconômico na região.

Nosso Blog informa sobre desenvolvimentos no tema de proteção de florestas tropicais em todo o mundo, mas com uma ênfase especial na região Amazônica. Nós somos uma equipe de pesquisadores baseada no Centro para Pesquisas de Desenvolvimento com experiência de campo no Brasil, Peru, Bolívia e Equador. Caso você se interesse pelo nosso trabalho em políticas ambientais, você pode visitar a página do nosso projeto  ou acompanhar os próximos posts no Blogazonia.

Grupo de pesquisa PA

Você pode fazer o download do video aqui.

Automated Mapping in R

After creating our base-layers within a PostGIS database as described here we used R to map our layers and create a plot showing the area count for each year from 1920 to 2012. In total we created 1840 plots (92 years x 20 buffers) that where then combined to produce this video.

The source code for the mappings is complex and wont be discussed in detail here but a brief description of the single steps as well as the code is provided for anybody interested in R-Programming:

A. Session Setup
Here we set our working directory, load all required libraries and suppress scientific notations (later-on important for the plots)

B. Load the data
We load all relevant data.

  • ucs_cum is a table that contains the area counts for all years and all protected area classes. We will need it for the area count on the left side of the video.
  • brasil and world.countries are two shapefiles that we need for our plots. World.countries contains the administration boarders for  all countries worldwide and brasil the boarders for Brazil. We fortify these shapefiles to make them understandable and plottable for ggplot2.
  • map.picture3 is the picture on the upper left of the video. We rasterize it to make it plottable.
  • Next we load all shapefiles that we need for the maps. All in all we have 3 different protected areas with each 20 shapefiles. To avoid too much code we have to automatize this follwing a simple three step approach: First we create a list with all filenames in a loop. Second we create an empty list where we will store our imports. Third we import the shapefiles with a loop thereby using the list of file-names. shapefiles.list.import contains all layers for all multiple use areas. shapefile.list.upi contains all layers for strictly protected areas and shapefile.list.ind contains all layers for indigenous territories. Afterwards we rearrange the order of the list and plot the minimum years because we will need this information later.

C: Construct parameters for the lineplot

Here we calculate the extension of all protected areas (total_protected_area_sqkm) and the extension of indigenous areas + strictly protected areas (total_uus_ind_sqkm). We need this information later  for the areacount plot.

D: Define viewports for the plots

We define different Viewports for the plots. Inside these Viewports we will later paste the different parts of our video (the map, the area count and the picture)

E: Define color schemes for the plots

We define custom colors for the different protected areas.

F: Define the different themes for the plots

We define how our plots made with ggplot2 should be lay-outed. Actually this piece of code was only created after we created the plots which come later. We externalize this part of the code because the plot function that follows afterwards is very long. If you do testplots and want to adjust small parameters in the layout, it might be an advantage to have the layout outside of the plot function.

G: Define additional parameters for the plots

Here we define the plot-title.

H: Construct the plotfunction

Now it gets tricky. In this function we do the following things.

  1. First we create additional layers that contain the information about protected areas ( These layers will display all protected areas that have been created until the respective year. We have to do it with an if-else statement since we don’t know if there is any data for the given year.
  2. Second we create additional layers that contain information only about the respective year. In this layer we plot our buffers that indicate the newly created areas (tmp.data1-3). Again we have to do it with an if-else statement since we don’t know if there is any data for the given year.
  3. We construct the mapplot by adding the baselayers (countries worldwide, Brazil) and additional layers from 1 and 2. We furthermore add limits, title, projection and theme configurations to the plot.
  4. We construct the lineplot (areacount) with geom_ribbon from ggplot2.
  5. We define the area count as a title of the lineplot and modify the plot.
  6. We load the picture
  7. We plot our plots. Therefore we first open a new png file. Inside this file we create a Grid where we push the Viewports. In each Viewport we place our plots.
  8. We turn the device off and finish our plotting function.

I: Plot the data

We plot the data iteratively over all years and all buffersizes. We therefore define the output path and create two vectors for the iteration. One containing the years to be plotted and another one containing the alpha levels for the different buffer sizes (if you watch the video carefully you might notice that the alpha level changes with buffersize).

We then plot everything which takes about 4 hours to complete.

J: Close the session

We close the session and save all created objects from the Global environment.


# protected_areas_plotting_1
# Author: Johannes Schielein
# Outline:
  # A. Session Setup
  # B. Load the data
  # C: Construct parameters for the lineplot
  # D: Define viewports for the plots
  # E: Define color schemes for the plots
  # F: Define the different themes for the plots
  # G: Define additional parameters for the plots
  # H: Construct the plotfunctions
  # I: Plot the data
  # J: Close the session

# ----------- A. Session Setup -----------
# set wd

# load workspace (if already saved once)

# activate required libraries
#font_import() # only if not already imported

# surpress cientific notation

# ----------- B.Load the data -----------
### Load the base data
# load cumulative uc data

# shp brasil
brasil<-readOGR("World Countries 2/","subset_brazil")

# shp worldcountries
world.countries<-readOGR("World Countries 2/","sa")

### load the PNG foto for the plots
map.picture3<-readPNG("pics/fotos3.png") #load fotos
map.picture3.rastered <-rasterGrob(map.picture3)

### Load all uus shapefiles
## create an interation vector with the names endings
# the endings of all shapfile names
shapefile.iteration.vector<-vector(length=20) #create the vector
shapefile.iteration.vector[1]<-0 # set the first place zero
for (i in 2:20)shapefile.iteration.vector[i]<-shapefile.iteration.vector[i-1]+5 #set the rest places according to the names endings
shapefile.iteration.vector #show the vector
## creat a vector with the complete names
shapefile.list<-vector(length=20) # create the vector
# create a list with the shapefile names
for (i in shapefile.iteration.vector)shapefile.list[i/5]<-paste("_uus_buffer",i,sep="") # paste beginning and end of names
shapefile.list[20]<-("_uus_buffer0") # _uus_buffer0 was lost so set it automatically
## import all shapefiles to the list
for (i in 1:20)shapefiles.list.import[[i]]<-readOGR("buffer_shps/",shapefile.list[i])

### Load all upi shapefiles
## create an interation vector with the names endings
## creat a vector with the complete names
shapefile.list.upi<-vector(length=20) # create the vector

# create a list with the shapefile names
for (i in shapefile.iteration.vector)shapefile.list.upi[i/5]<-paste("_upi_buffer",i,sep="") # paste beginning and end of names
shapefile.list.upi[20]<-("_upi_buffer0") # _uus_buffer0 was lost so set it automatically
## import all shapefiles to the list
for (j in 1:20)shapefiles.list.import.upi[[j]]<-readOGR("buffer_shps/",shapefile.list.upi[j])

### Load all indigenous shapefiles
## create an interation vector with the names endings
## creat a vector with the complete names
shapefile.list.ind<-vector(length=20) # create the vector

# create a list with the shapefile names
for (i in shapefile.iteration.vector)shapefile.list.ind[i/5]<-paste("_ind_buffer",i,sep="") # paste beginning and end of names
shapefile.list.ind[20]<-("_ind_buffer0") # _uus_buffer0 was lost so set it automatically

## import all shapefiles to the list
for (k in 1:20)shapefiles.list.import.ind[[k]]<-readOGR("buffer_shps/",shapefile.list.ind[k])

### rearrange the shapefiles lists to have a better naming

# remove old shapefilelists

# find out the first year of the different type of protected areas
min(shapefiles.list.import.2[[20]]$DATE_CREAT,na.rm=T) # uus = 1927
min(shapefiles.list.import.ind.2[[20]]$DATE_CREAT,na.rm=T) # ind = 1926
min(shapefiles.list.import.upi.2[[20]]$DATE_CREAT,na.rm=T) # upi = 1896

### ----------C: construct parameters for the lineplot----------

# calculate sqkm for ucs cumulatice
for (i in 2:5)


# calculate the total protected area

# calculate uus+ind

### --------- D: define viewports for the plots ----------
# define first plot area
vp1 <- viewport(x = 1.05, y = 0.133,
                height = 0.72, width = 0.72,
                just = c("right", "bottom"),
                name = "map"
# define second plot area
vp2 <- viewport(x = 0.05, y = 0.505,
                height = 0.3, width = 0.361,
                just = c("left", "bottom"),
# define third plot area
vp3 <- viewport(x = 0.05, y = 0.12,
                height = 0.36, width = 0.361,
                just = c("left", "bottom"),

# define fourth plot area
vp4 <- viewport(x = 0.5, y = 0.95,
                height = 0.1, width = 0.8,
                just = c("center", "center"),

### ---------- E: define color schemes for the plots ----------

### --------- F: define the different themes for the plots ----------
## for additional information on how to manage them themes see the ggplot2 help

# plot 1 = maps
theme.plot.1<-list(theme(panel.background = element_rect(fill = "lightskyblue2", color="black"),
                          panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
                          panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
                          axis.text.x = element_text(size=25,colour="white"),
                          axis.text.y = element_text(size=25,colour="white"),
                          axis.title.x= element_text(size=25,colour="white"),
                          axis.title.y= element_text(size=25,colour="white"),
                          plot.title = element_text(size=75,vjust=3,family="DejaVu Sans Condensed",colour="white"),
                          plot.background = element_rect(fill="black",colour="black")
# plot 2 = lineplot
theme.plot.2<-list(theme(panel.grid.minor = element_blank(),
                         panel.grid.major = element_blank(),
                         plot.title = element_text(size=60,vjust=1,family="DejaVu Sans Condensed",colour="white"),
                         panel.background=element_rect(fill = "black"),
                         legend.justification = c(0, 1),
                         legend.text=element_text(size=25,family="DejaVu Sans Condensed",colour="white"),
                         legend.background = element_rect(fill="black",colour="black"),
                         axis.ticks.length = unit(0.3, "cm"),
                         axis.line.y = element_blank(),
                         plot.background = element_rect(fill="black",colour="black")

### --------- G: define additional parameters for the plots ----------
# the title
plot.title<-textGrob("Protected Areas in Brazil",
                     gp = gpar(fontfamily="DejaVu Sans Condensed",
                               fontsize = 90,

#### ---------- H: Construct the plotfunction ----------

  ### 1. fortify all shapefiles for the plot

  ## 1.1 fortify all existing protected areas until the year (unbufferd)
  # layer 1 unbuffered
  else{<-"no area for first unbuffered layer"}
  # layer 2 unbuffered
  else{<-"no area for second unbuffered layer"}
  # layer 3 unbuffered
  else{<-"no area for third unbuffered layer"}

  ## 1.2 fortify protected areas for the respective year if there was a creation/data is available (with buffer)
  # layer 1 buffered
                                       ([[my.buffer.size]]@data$DATE_CREAT>=my.year &
                                                  ([[my.buffer.size]]@data$DATE_CREAT>=my.year &
                                                     {tmp.data1<-"no area for first layer"}
  # layer 2 buffered
                                       ([[my.buffer.size]]@data$DATE_CREAT>=my.year &
                                                  ([[my.buffer.size]]@data$DATE_CREAT>=my.year &
                                                     {tmp.data2<-"no area for second layer"}

  # layer 3 buffered
                                       ([[my.buffer.size]]@data$DATE_CREAT>=my.year &
                                                  ([[my.buffer.size]]@data$DATE_CREAT>=my.year &
                                                     {tmp.data3<-"no area for third layer"}

  ### 2. construct the mapplot
  ## 2.1 add the base layers

  ## 2.2 add all existing protected areas until the year unbufferd
  if (
  # else{print(} # activate this option if you want to trace the layers within each map
  if (
  # else{print(}
  if (

  ## 2.3 add protected areas with buffer if data is available for the respective year
  # layer ind
  if ({tmp.plot<-
                                                          map=tmp.data1, data=tmp.data1,
  # layer uus
  if ({tmp.plot<-
                                                          map=tmp.data2, data=tmp.data2,
  # layer upi
  if ({tmp.plot<-
                                                          map=tmp.data3, data=tmp.data3,

  ## 2.4 add limits, title, projection and theme configurations to the plot

  ### 3. construct the lineplot
  ## 3.1 plot
    geom_ribbon(aes(x=year,# is going to be area for upi
    geom_ribbon(aes(x=year,# is going to be area for uus
    geom_ribbon(aes(x=year,#is going to be area for ind

    ## 3.2. area count as title
            digits=0), # together with round cuts the digits off
          big.mark=","), # together with format creates the thousend seperators)
    ## 3.3 modify the plot
    # scales and colours
                      labels=c("  Strictly Protected Areas","  Multiple Use Reserves","  Indigenous Areas"))+
                        guide="none")+ # to surpress the legend of the outlines
    scale_x_continuous(breaks=seq(1920, 2010, by = 10),
                       limits=c(1920,2013), # set value limits of axis
                       expand=c(0, 0))+ # set visible limits of axis
    # add the themes

  ### 4. Construct the plot with extra information

  ###  Combine the plots and make png outputs
  ## new png
  png(filename=paste(my.path,"map_",my.year,"_buffer",my.buffer.size,".png",sep=""), width=2560, height=1600)
  ## mapplot

  # mapplot
  grid.newpage()# clear plot area
  grid.rect(gp = gpar(fill = "black")) #show the plotting region (viewport extent)
  pushViewport(vp1) # enter vp1
  print(tmp.plot, newpage = FALSE) # plot1
  upViewport(1) # leave vp1

  # lineplot
  print(tmp.plot2, newpage = FALSE)

  # mapinfo
  print(grid.draw(my.picture), newpage=FALSE)

  # title
  print(grid.draw(plot.title), newpage=FALSE)

  ## Turn the device off to finish the print

  ### Finishing the function
  print(paste("Map completed for",my.year/10000,"with buffersize",my.buffer.size,"and opacity set to",my.alpha))

#### --------- I: Plot the data ----------

# define the path for the plot outputs

# create a string to iterate over the input data ucs year by year
for (i in 2:length(1896:2013))iteration.string.plot[i]<-iteration.string.plot[i-1]+10000

# create a vector that contains the transparency/alpha values for each buffer<-seq(from=0.5,to=1,length.out=20)

# plot all years and buffers (over 2gb size!)
for (j in 2:length(iteration.string.plot)){
  for (i in 19)

# ---------- J: Close session----------